Add preliminary STC8 support
What works: * Frequency calibration of internal RC oscillator * Flash/EEPROM programming What doesn't work yet: * Everything else
This commit is contained in:
133
doc/stc8-protocol.txt
Normal file
133
doc/stc8-protocol.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
|
||||
Overview of changes
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The following changes have been observed compared to STC15:
|
||||
|
||||
- Many differences in the status packet
|
||||
- At least some differences in MCS
|
||||
- Different challenge
|
||||
- no separate program speed
|
||||
- clock division was introduced; calibration always in the ~20-30 MHz range, lower clocks
|
||||
use division
|
||||
- the meaning of the calibration ranges and trim has changed
|
||||
|
||||
The good:
|
||||
|
||||
- Erase, Program, etc. operations are apparently unchanged. :)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Status packet
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 30 50 00 54 62 58 5D 00 04 FF FD 8B BF FF 27 4A F7 FE 73 55 00 F6 28 09 85 E3 5F 80 07 20 20 20 01 00 00 FE 05 3A 17 05 25 91 FF 10 AE 16
|
||||
^^^^^ wakeup clock
|
||||
|
||||
Clock set to 20 MHz by STC-ISP (encoding is different compared to STC15):
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 30 50 01 31 2E 90 38 01 01 FF FD 8B BF FF 27 35 F7 FE 73 55 00 F6 28 09 85 E3 5F 80 07 20 20 20 01 00 00 FE 05 3A 17 05 25 91 FF 10 54 16
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 30 50 01 31 2E 90 38 01 01 FF FD 8B BF FF 27 3B F7 FE 73 55 00 F6 28 09 85 E3 5F 80 07 20 20 20 01 00 00 FE 05 3A 17 05 25 91 FF 10 5A 16
|
||||
^^^^^ some 24 MHz reference or other clk measurement?
|
||||
^^^^^ trim/adjust?
|
||||
^^ clkdiv
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^ clk
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Disconnect
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Uses FF command byte.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Basic challenge operation
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Host sends a challenge of some kind, followed by 0xfe pulsing
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 6A 00 0C 00 02 00 00 80 00 00 F8 16
|
||||
|
||||
Much simpler than in STC15
|
||||
|
||||
MCU sends back some response:
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 0C 00 02 36 AD 4E 83 02 2A 16
|
||||
|
||||
Host now sends some longer challenge, followed by more pulses:
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 6A 00 20 00 0C 7C 00 7C 01 7C 02 7C 03 7D 00 7D 01 7D 02 7D 03 7E 00 7E 01 7E 02 7E 03 06 84 16
|
||||
|
||||
MCU sends back some response:
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 20 00 0C 4D C6 4D DB 4D E7 4D F3 4D F6 4E 0E 4E 11 4E 26 4E 26 4E 32 4E 41 4E 56 09 DC 16
|
||||
|
||||
Host now seems to initiate a baud switch or something like that
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 6A 00 0E 01 00 00 FF CC 01 7C 80 03 41 16
|
||||
|
||||
MCU acknowlegdes it:
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 07 01 00 70 16
|
||||
|
||||
Now the MCU switches to the new baud rate.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Challenges observed
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
6 MHz:
|
||||
|
||||
46B96A0020000C 1400 1401 1402 1403 1500 1501 1502 1503 1600 1601 1602 1603 01A416
|
||||
|
||||
5.5 MHz:
|
||||
|
||||
46B96A0020000C 5C00 5C01 5C02 5C03 5D00 5D01 5D02 5D03 5E00 5E01 5E02 5E03 050416
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
11 MHz:
|
||||
|
||||
46B96A0020000C 5B00 5B01 5B02 5B03 5C00 5C01 5C02 5C03 5D00 5D01 5D02 5D03 04F816
|
||||
|
||||
20 MHz:
|
||||
|
||||
46B96A0020000C 3600 3601 3602 3603 3700 3701 3702 3703 3800 3801 3802 3803 033C16
|
||||
|
||||
24 MHz:
|
||||
|
||||
46B96A0020000C 7C00 7C01 7C02 7C03 7D00 7D01 7D02 7D03 7E00 7E01 7E02 7E03 068416
|
||||
|
||||
27 MHz:
|
||||
|
||||
46B96A0020000C B000 B001 B002 B003 B100 B101 B102 B103 B200 B201 B202 B203 08F416
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Ranges vs trim value
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
46 B9 6A 00 20 00 0C 00 00 80 00 FF 00 00 01 80 01 FF 01 00 02 80 02 FF 02 00 03 80 03 FF 03 06 A4 16
|
||||
46 B9 68 00 20 00 0C 36 9B 4E 92 65 E4 36 CB 4E 7D 66 29 36 D1 4E 83 66 05 36 CB 4E C2 66 47 0A EA 16
|
||||
|
||||
first byte determines general trim value... range of ~16 to ~30 MHz, the second byte (00..03) is a fine adjustment.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Clock division?
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
5.5 MHz vs 11 Mhz: challenge is about the same. it's likely some kind of clock divider is used!
|
||||
|
||||
5.5 Mhz switch: 01 00 00 FF CC 01 5C 80 clkdiv = 4?
|
||||
11 MHz switch: 01 00 00 FF CC 01 5B 80 clkdiv = 2?
|
||||
22 MHz switch: 01 00 00 FF CC 01 5C 80 clkdiv = 1?
|
||||
|
||||
22 Mhz option packet: 0400005AA5FFFFFF00FFFF00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF01516D405D0201FFFDFFFFFF8BBFF7FE
|
||||
11 MHz option packet: 0400005AA5FFFFFF00FFFF00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF00A8AF985D0102FFFDFFFFFF8BBFF7FE
|
||||
5.5 MHz option packet: 0400005AA5FFFFFF00FFFF00FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF00FF005462585D0004FFFDFFFFFF8BBFF7FE
|
||||
^^ clkdiv?
|
||||
^^^^^^^^ clkspeed
|
||||
|
||||
Always 24 MHz for programming
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Calibration for anything but 24 Mhz (and around that) fails when switching baud. Another observation is that there is no
|
||||
programming speed being calibrated anymore. This may suggest that a fixed speed is used for programming.
|
||||
|
||||
Adjusting BRT calculation to 24 MHz in the switch packet seems to work. So it is really using 24 MHz by default;
|
||||
probably some pre-calibrated value.
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user