Separate the control channel from data channel on two different threads.
Solved the DTLS problem of using a separate thread for the data channel.
This commit is contained in:
@ -66,9 +66,9 @@ static int ac_init(void) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sessions */
|
||||
g_ac.sessions = capwap_list_create();
|
||||
g_ac.sessionsdata = capwap_list_create();
|
||||
g_ac.sessionsthread = capwap_list_create();
|
||||
capwap_rwlock_init(&g_ac.sessionslock);
|
||||
g_ac.datasessionshandshake = capwap_list_create();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Backend */
|
||||
g_ac.availablebackends = capwap_array_create(sizeof(struct ac_http_soap_server*), 0, 0);
|
||||
@ -100,12 +100,12 @@ static void ac_destroy(void) {
|
||||
/* */
|
||||
capwap_array_free(g_ac.dfa.acipv4list.addresses);
|
||||
capwap_array_free(g_ac.dfa.acipv6list.addresses);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sessions */
|
||||
capwap_list_free(g_ac.sessions);
|
||||
capwap_list_free(g_ac.sessionsdata);
|
||||
capwap_list_free(g_ac.sessionsthread);
|
||||
capwap_rwlock_destroy(&g_ac.sessionslock);
|
||||
capwap_list_free(g_ac.datasessionshandshake);
|
||||
ac_session_msgqueue_free();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Backend */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user